20 years of development is embedded in the NT kernel, which is still what Windows 8 uses.
Mixxx 1.12 software#
Not just for stragglers or stubborn users, but because working older hardware isn't garbage, it can't all get converted into a webserver or whatever, and honestly I don't think software developers should acquiesce to marginalizing it just because exciting new possibilities exist along the current edge. In general, though it seems like good design to be as backwards-compatible as possible. I don't think we're going to be in too much trouble supporting XP, even if there is a bit of limping involved:)Īs for the actual topic of this bug ) I suppose when Qt makes a decision we'll have no choice but to get saddled with the consequences. In general, though it seems like good design to be as backwards- compatible as possible. Most of these concerns are security related.Īs long as Mixxx doesn't need to be online to fulfill its primary function, and as long as network connectivity is optional and controllable (including proxy/SSL support, etc.) I'm completely unperturbed.Īs for the actual topic of this bug ) I suppose when Qt makes a decision we'll have no choice but to get saddled with the consequences.
I also think webapps are a horrible thing. I think the "internet of things" is a deeply and profoundly flawed design movement, and I don't feel that software or hardware that is not explicitly made for communication or connectivity should concern itself with the internet any more than my shoe should schedule an appointment with the cobbler all by itself when it senses that it needs to be resoled. The tone you probably detected in my comment had more to do with my strong feelings about internet reliance issues.
Max - Thank you for being gracious and careful, but I wasn't offended.
0 kommentar(er)
